Publication | Open Access
Impacts of Informal Caregiving on Caregiver Employment, Health, and Family
154
Citations
65
References
2015
Year
Palliative CareFamily MedicineNursingSocial CareFamily ResponsibilitiesCaregiverSociologyElderly CareLong-term CareInformal CaregivingSocial PolicyMedicineSocial WorkFamily RelationshipsHealth Sciences
Informal caregiving is increasingly important as the aging population grows, yet research is heterogeneous due to interdisciplinary designs, sampling, and statistical methods. The paper reviews existing research on informal caregiving’s impact on caregivers’ employment, health, and family life, noting that family implications are underinvestigated. The authors conduct a literature review of studies examining informal caregiving’s effects on employment, health, and family. Findings indicate that informal caregiving is associated with lower employment levels but affects a relatively small labor force; it also reduces caregivers’ psychological and physical health, with female, spousal, and intensive caregivers most impacted, though results vary across subgroups.
As the aging population increases, the demand for informal caregiving is becoming an ever more important concern for researchers and policy-makers alike. To shed light on the implications of informal caregiving, this paper reviews current research on its impact on three areas of caregivers' lives: employment, health, and family. Because the literature is inherently interdisciplinary, the research designs, sampling procedures, and statistical methods used are heterogeneous. Nevertheless, we are still able to draw several conclusions: first, despite the prevalence of informal caregiving and its primary association with lower levels of employment, the affected labor force is seemingly small. Second, such caregiving tends to lower the quality of the caregiver's psychological health, which also has a negative impact on physical health outcomes. Third, the implications for family life remain under investigated. The research findings also differ strongly among subgroups, although they do suggest that female, spousal, and intense caregivers tend to be the most affected by caregiving.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1