New Zealand Economic Papers · 2017 · 38 citations · 19 references
Public AffairsPublic PolicyBudget EvaluationFundraisingScience PolicyPerformance-based FundingPublication BiasResearch Impact AssessmentResearch PolicySelection BiasStudy SelectionCitation BehaviorPerformance-based Research FundingResearch Funding Impact AssessmentResearch Output Citation ImpactScientific Performance MetricsSelection Bias AnalysisSelection Bias In FundingStudy Selection Process
We estimate the impact of the NZ Marsden Fund on research success, by comparing the subsequent performance of funded and unfunded researchers. We control for selection bias using the Marsden panel rankings. We find that funding is associated with a 6%–15% increase in publications and an 11%–22% increase in citation-weighted papers for research teams. We attempt to pin down the dynamic structure of this effect by looking at the research trajectories of individual researchers, but this model yields inconsistent results. We find no systematic evidence that Marsden panel rankings are predictive of subsequent success.
19
Journal of economic literature
J. Armstrong · International Journal of Forecasting · 1996 · 10K citations
Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice
Guido W. Imbens, Thomas Lemieux · Journal of Econometrics · 2007 · 3.8K citations
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
Christine Wennerås, Agnes E. Wold · Nature · 1997 · 1.4K citations
Lutz Bornmann · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · 2011 · 566 citations