Concepedia

TLDR

Crowdsourcing communities repeatedly gather product ideas from dispersed nonexperts, yet little is known about individual ideation patterns within these online platforms. Serial ideators are more likely to produce implementable ideas than one‑time contributors, but they rarely repeat success and tend to propose less diverse ideas after implementation; diverse commenting activity can mitigate these negative effects, highlighting challenges in sustaining high‑quality idea streams. The paper was accepted by Kamalini Ramdas, entrepreneurship and innovation.

Abstract

Several organizations have developed ongoing crowdsourcing communities that repeatedly collect ideas for new products and services from a large, dispersed “crowd” of nonexperts (consumers) over time. Despite its promises, little is known about the nature of an individual's ideation efforts in such an online community. Studying Dell's IdeaStorm community, serial ideators are found to be more likely than consumers with only one idea to generate an idea the organization finds valuable enough to implement, but they are unlikely to repeat their early success once their ideas are implemented. As ideators with past success attempt to again come up with ideas that will excite the organization, they instead end up proposing ideas similar to their ideas that were already implemented (i.e., they generate less diverse ideas). The negative effects of past success are somewhat mitigated for ideators with diverse commenting activity on others' ideas. These findings highlight some of the challenges in maintaining an ongoing supply of quality ideas from the crowd over time. This paper was accepted by Kamalini Ramdas, entrepreneurship and innovation.

References

YearCitations

Page 1