Evaluation of AR-HUD Interface During an Automated Intervention in Manual Driving

Abstract

Automated driving systems are envisioned as the future mode of transportation owing to their projected ability to reduce human error and achieve more efficient and comfortable transportation. Accordingly, designing an interface that ensures the situational awareness of the human operator to reduce confusion, false expectations, and over-reliance on the automated system is important. When a human operator is in control, the automated system is expected to handle troublesome situations that the human is unable to manage. Thus, an interface is required to provide the appropriate information when necessary so that the human operator can easily perceive the reason for the sudden automated intervention. In this study, such a scenario is highlighted, in which a simulated automated intervention avoided a potential collision with a pedestrian who suddenly appeared on the roadside. To convey the reason for the automated intervention, an augmented reality-based head-up display (AR-HUD) cue that targets the pedestrian is developed. To understand the effects of the AR-HUD cue on the speed at which a human operator can recognize a pedestrian and the contribution of this visual cue to the perception of acceptability and credibility of the automated intervention, we compared AR-HUD with a static head-up display (S-HUD) that displays a pedestrian symbol at the bottom portion of the windshield. The results showed that the AR-HUD cue yielded faster recognition of the targeted pedestrian and provided a relatively more acceptable perception of the automated intervention.