Publication | Closed Access
Analysis of Timing Errors in Time-of-Flight LiDAR Using APDs and SPADs Receivers
18
Citations
6
References
2020
Year
EngineeringMeasurementOptical TestingEducationSpads ReceiversTiming ErrorCalibrationTiming AnalysisSystems EngineeringLaser-based SensorInstrumentationOptical SystemsTime-of-flight ImagingFlight ValidationPhotonicsTime-of-flight CameraAircraft NavigationTime MetrologyLidarOptical MeasurementPhoton StatisticAerospace EngineeringUltimate Timing ErrorAvalanche Photodiode Apd
We analyze the ultimate timing error that can be achieved in the operation of a LiDAR based on the time-of-flight (ToF) measurement of distance using a pulsed light source and two possible detectors in the optic receiver: (i) an avalanche photodiode APD in linear mode, and (ii) a SPAD single photon detector. We analyze both the random and systematic contributions to the total error and find that the latter becomes dominant at large (>10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> ) number of detected photons N <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ph</sub> . However, the systematic error can be cancelled by a separate measurement of N <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ph</sub> . As a conclusion, it is found that, aside from a multiplicative factor of the order of unity, all the schemes supply a timing error given by τ/√N <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ph</sub> , where τ is the characteristic time describing the illumination waveform. The theory we have developed provides a theoretical framework for the evaluation of the precision of time-of-flight measurement, and the results are applicable as a benchmark of the timing performance obtained by practical instruments.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1