Academic Emergency Medicine · 2020 · 106 citations · 82 references
MedicineEmergency MedicineGeriatric MedicineGeriatric AssessmentGeriatric NursingGeriatricsDelirium AssessmentDelirium CareDelirium ManagementDelirium PreventionGeriatric EmergenciesGeriatric Emergency CareBedside Delirium AssessmentDelirium Assessment ScalesDelirium EpidemiologyDelirium EtiologyDelirium Observation ToolsDelirium PrevalenceGeriatric Delirium ManagementResearch Evidence Integration
BACKGROUND: Older adult delirium is often unrecognized in the emergency department (ED), yet the most compelling research questions to overcome knowledge-to-practice deficits remain undefined. The Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR) Network was organized to identify and prioritize delirium clinical questions. METHODS: GEAR identified and engaged 49 transdisciplinary stakeholders including emergency physicians, geriatricians, nurses, social workers, pharmacists, and patient advocates. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews, clinical questions were derived, medical librarian electronic searches were conducted, and applicable research evidence was synthesized for ED delirium detection, prevention, and management. The scoping review served as the foundation for a consensus conference to identify the highest priority research foci. RESULTS: In the scoping review, 27 delirium detection "instruments" were described in 48 ED studies and used variable criterion standards with the result of delirium prevalence ranging from 6% to 38%. Clinician gestalt was the most common "instrument" evaluated with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 81% and specificity from 65% to 100%. For delirium management, 15 relevant studies were identified, including one randomized controlled trial. Some intervention studies targeted clinicians via education and others used clinical pathways. Three medications were evaluated to reduce or prevent ED delirium. No intervention consistently prevented or treated delirium. After reviewing the scoping review results, the GEAR stakeholders identified ED delirium prevention interventions not reliant on additional nurse or physician effort as the highest priority research. CONCLUSIONS: Transdisciplinary stakeholders prioritize ED delirium prevention studies that are not reliant on health care worker tasks instead of alternative research directions such as defining etiologic delirium phenotypes to target prevention or intervention strategies.
82
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch · Biometrics · 1977 · 78.9K citations · Full text
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2018 · 40.4K citations · Full text
Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method
Sharon K. Inouye · Annals of Internal Medicine · 1990 · 5.3K citations