JAMA Network Open · 2020 · 136 citations · 34 references
MedicineMedical EducationSurgeryGeneral SurgeryPopulation StudiesResidency TrainingDiversityEthnic GroupsEthnic MinoritiesRaceSurgical ResidencyDemographic Pattern AnalysisEthnic Disparities Over TimeRacial Diversity AnalysisSelf-reported EthnicitySurgical Workforce Development
Surgical programs in the U.S. invest in diversity initiatives, yet it remains unclear whether these efforts have altered the proportion of applicants or matriculants from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups. The study analyzed data from the Association of American Medical Colleges on 737,034 applicants and 265,365 matriculants, including 134,158 applicants and 41,347 matriculants to surgical specialties, from 2010–2018.
Surgical programs across the US continue to promote and invest in initiatives aimed at improving racial/ethnic diversity, but whether this translates to changes in the percentage of applicants or matriculants from racial/ethnic minority groups remains unclear.To examine trends in the percentage of applicants and matriculants to US surgical specialties who identified as part of a racial/ethnic group underrepresented in medicine from the 2010-2011 to 2018-2019 academic years.This cross-sectional study examined trends in self-reported racial/ethnic identity among applicants and matriculants to US residency programs to evaluate demographic changes among surgical programs from 2010 to 2018. Data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges.The study population consisted of a total of 737 034 applicants and 265 365 matriculants to US residency programs, including 134 158 applicants and 41 347 matriculants to surgical programs. A total of 21 369 applicants (15.9%) and 5704 matriculants (13.8%) to surgical specialties identified as underrepresented in medicine. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of applicants underrepresented in medicine based on race/ethnicity for all surgical specialties combined in 2010 vs 2018 (15.3% [95% CI, 14.7%-15.9%] vs 17.5% [95% CI, 16.9%-18.1%]; P = .63). Thoracic surgery was the only surgical specialty in which there was a statistically significant change in the percentage of applicants (8.1% [95% CI, 4.9%-13.2%] vs 14.6% [95% CI, 10.2%-20.4%]; P = .02) or matriculants (0% [95% CI, 0%-19.4%] vs 10.0% [95% CI, 4.0%-23.1%]; P = .01) underrepresented in medicine based on race/ethnicity. Obstetrics and gynecology had the highest mean percentage of applicants (20.2%; 95% CI, 19.4%-20.8%) and matriculants (19.0%; 95% CI, 18.2%-19.8%) underrepresented in medicine among surgical specialties. Thoracic surgery had the lowest mean percentage of applicants (12.5%; 95% CI, 9.46%-15.4%) and otolaryngology the lowest mean percentage of matriculants (8.5%; 95% CI, 7.2%-9.9%) underrepresented in medicine.In this cross-sectional study, overall US surgical programs had no change in the percentage of applicants or matriculants who self-identified as underrepresented in medicine based on race/ethnicity, but the proportion remained higher than in nonsurgical specialties. Reevaluation of current strategies aimed at increasing racial/ethnic representation appear to be necessary to help close the existing gap in medicine and recruit a more racially/ethnically diverse surgical workforce.
34
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 21.6K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
The Association of American Medical Colleges
FRED C. ZAPFFE · Academic Medicine · 1938 · 5.6K citations
Minority Physicians’ Role in the Care of Underserved Patients
Lyndonna Marrast, Leah Zallman, Steffie Woolhandler et al. · JAMA Internal Medicine · 2013 · 587 citations
Trends in Racial/Ethnic Representation Among US Medical Students
Elle Lett, H. Moses Murdock, Whitney Orji et al. · JAMA Network Open · 2019 · 337 citations · Full text