arXiv (Cornell University) · 2020 · 81 citations · 48 references
Artificial IntelligenceNeural Scaling LawConvolutional Neural NetworkNormalization TechniquesModern Deep LearningMachine LearningEffective Step SizesEngineeringMomentum OptimizersSparse Neural NetworkComputer EngineeringLarge Scale OptimizationComputer ScienceDeep LearningEnergy MinimizationFeature ScalingAdaptive OptimizationScale-invariant Weights
Normalization techniques are a boon for modern deep learning. They let weights converge more quickly with often better generalization performances. It has been argued that the normalization-induced scale invariance among the weights provides an advantageous ground for gradient descent (GD) optimizers: the effective step sizes are automatically reduced over time, stabilizing the overall training procedure. It is often overlooked, however, that the additional introduction of momentum in GD optimizers results in a far more rapid reduction in effective step sizes for scale-invariant weights, a phenomenon that has not yet been studied and may have caused unwanted side effects in the current practice. This is a crucial issue because arguably the vast majority of modern deep neural networks consist of (1) momentum-based GD (e.g. SGD or Adam) and (2) scale-invariant parameters. In this paper, we verify that the widely-adopted combination of the two ingredients lead to the premature decay of effective step sizes and sub-optimal model performances. We propose a simple and effective remedy, SGDP and AdamP: get rid of the radial component, or the norm-increasing direction, at each optimizer step. Because of the scale invariance, this modification only alters the effective step sizes without changing the effective update directions, thus enjoying the original convergence properties of GD optimizers. Given the ubiquity of momentum GD and scale invariance in machine learning, we have evaluated our methods against the baselines on 13 benchmarks. They range from vision tasks like classification (e.g. ImageNet), retrieval (e.g. CUB and SOP), and detection (e.g. COCO) to language modelling (e.g. WikiText) and audio classification (e.g. DCASE) tasks. We verify that our solution brings about uniform gains in those benchmarks. Source code is available at https://github.com/clovaai/AdamP.
48
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 214.9K citations · Full text
Image Classification, Deep Neural Networks, Machine Vision +14
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio et al. · Proceedings of the IEEE · 1998 · 56.5K citations · Full text
Engineering, Machine Learning, Multilayer Neural Networks +17
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su et al. · International Journal of Computer Vision · 2015 · 39.5K citations
Image Classification, Convolutional Neural Network, Machine Vision +7
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu et al. · 2018 · 24.2K citations
Convolutional Neural Network, Scene Analysis, Engineering +17