Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift

24.2K

Citations

22

References

2015

Year

TLDR

Training deep neural networks is hampered by shifting layer input distributions, which slows learning and demands careful initialization, especially with saturating nonlinearities. The authors aim to mitigate internal covariate shift by normalizing layer inputs. They incorporate batch‑wise normalization directly into the network architecture, normalizing each mini‑batch during training. Batch Normalization enables higher learning rates, reduces the need for careful initialization, acts as a regularizer, cuts training steps by 14× while improving accuracy, and with ensembles surpasses human‑level performance on ImageNet with 4.9 % top‑5 error.

Abstract

Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14 times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5 validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.

References

YearCitations

1998

56.5K

2014

34.2K

2015

18.4K

2010

13.2K

2010

12.6K

2000

8.7K

2010

8.6K

2012

3.8K

2013

3.5K

2012

2.9K

Page 1