PLoS ONE · 2020 · 10 citations · 31 references
MedicineOncologyUrologyChemotherapyDna RepairMolecular OncologyCancer GenomicsGenitourinary Cancer PharmacotherapyMetastatic Disease TreatmentMolecular Tumor ProfilingNext-generation Sequencing In OncologyProstate CancerCastration-resistant Prostate Cancer TherapyDna Repair Gene MutationsGermline MutationsHomologous Recombination RepairMetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate CancerNext-generation Sequencing AssaysTaxane ChemotherapyTumor Susceptibility Genes
INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbor mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair genes, with some of these mutations associating with increased tumor susceptibility to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. While mutations in some HR repair genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) have been associated with a more aggressive clinical course, prior studies correlating HR mutational status with treatment response to androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) or taxane-based chemotherapy have yielded conflicting results. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to assess clinical outcomes to conventional, regulatory-approved therapies in mCRPC patients with somatic (monoallelic and biallelic) and/or germline HR repair mutations compared to patients without alterations as determined by clinical-grade next-generation sequencing assays. The primary endpoint was PSA30/PSA50 response, defined as ≥30%/≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints of PSA progression-free survival (pPFS) and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 90 consecutively selected patients were included in this analysis, of which 33 (37%) were identified to have HR repair gene mutations. Age, race, Gleason score, prior surgery, and receipt of prior radiation therapy were comparable between carriers and non-carriers. There was no evidence that PSA30/PSA50 differed by HR gene mutational status. Median pPFS and crPFS ranged 3-14 months across treatment modalities, but there was no evidence either differed by HR gene mutational status (all p>0.05). There was also no difference in outcomes between those with BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations (n = 17) compared to those without HR repair mutations. CONCLUSION: HR gene mutational status was associated with comparable clinical outcomes following treatment with ARSIs or taxane-based chemotherapy. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
31
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Dan R. Robinson, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Yi-Mi Wu et al. · Cell · 2015 · 3.6K citations · Full text
Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Johann S. de Bono, Joaquı́n Mateo, Karim Fizazi et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 2.2K citations · Full text
DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Joaquı́n Mateo, Suzanne Carreira, Shahneen Sandhu et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 2.2K citations · Full text
Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Colin C. Pritchard, Joaquı́n Mateo, Michael F. Walsh et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Oncology +17