The application of temperature sensitivity CRISPR/LbCpf1 (LbCas12a) mediated genome editing in allotetraploid cotton (<i>G. hirsutum</i>) and creation of nontransgenic, gossypol‐free cotton

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is an allotetraploid species and a typical thermophilic crop that can survive and grow well under temperatures up to 45 °C. CRISPR/LbCpf1 (LbCas12a) is a temperature-sensitive system for plant genome editing (Malzahn et al., 2019) and has been successfully applied in species such as rice, soya bean, tobacco, maize and cotton (Lee et al., 2019; Li et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2019). However, the temperature sensitivity of LbCpf1 has not been tested in cotton yet, a high temperature-resistant crop. In order to improve LbCpf1 efficiency and determine the optimum temperature for cotton genome editing, we investigated the effects of different temperatures on LbCpf1 activity and genome editing efficiency. Moreover, we created nontransgenic and glandless cotton plants with seeds free of gossypol, representing a valuable germplasm resource for cotton breeding. In a development from our previous study (Li et al., 2019), we found that the observed albino phenotype of transgenic cotton plants containing LbCpf1-GhCLA1 became enhanced and with an increase of temperature in plants grown in the field in Wuhan (Figure 1a). In order to determine the editing efficacy of LbCpf1 under elevated temperatures, 20 T1 seeds from a LbCpf1-GhCLA1 transgenic line with whitish dappled leaves were sown in a growth chamber at either 24 °C, 29 °C, 34 °C or 37 °C for one week. We found that the cotyledons exhibited different degrees of albinism (Figure 1b, upper panel). All 20 plants showed dappled cotyledons at 24 °C. At 29 °C, 16 plants had some white spots and 4 plants had fully white cotyledons. At 34 °C, 13 plants were fully white, 3 plants were dappled and 4 plants had partially white cotyledons. In a parallel experiment, 20 T1 seeds were sown at 24 °C under the same conditions described above. When the plants developed the first true leaf, they were transferred to 24 °C, 29 °C, 34 °C or 37 °C for 2 weeks, with similar results as described for the previous experiment (Figure 1b, lower panel). However, long and continuous treatment at 37 °C significantly inhibited cotton growth, and some plants died. We determined the editing profiles of T1 seedlings using Sanger sequencing and High-throughput sequencing (Hi-Tom) (Liu et al., 2019). The results showed that each individual plant contained different editing frequencies, and the editing efficiency of GhCLA1 in both the At and Dt subgenomes was 68.4% at 24 °C, 85.3% at 29 °C and 89.7% at 34 °C (Figure 1c). The elevated editing efficiency (genotype) under the higher temperature was in accordance with the observed phenotypic changes under the various temperature regimes. Cotton seeds are a rich source of oil and protein, but are not edible due to the toxicity of the metabolite gossypol, which is stored in dark pigmented glands and is only produced in Gossypium species. Silencing the PIGMENT GLAND FORMATION (PGF) gene by RNAi leads to a glandless phenotype (Ma et al., 2016). To further test the efficiency of CRISPR/LbCpf1 system under different temperatures in cotton, we conducted a targeted editing in the coding sequence of GhPGF by using the tRNA-crRNA1-tRNA-crRNA2 transcription unit developed in our recent report (Wang et al., 2018; Figure 1d). LbCpf1-GhPGF-transformed somatic embyrogenic calli were grown in light incubators at 24 °C, 29 °C, 34 °C or 37 °C for one week. Thirty independent T0 plants were obtained from the treated calli. We found that glands were reduced in number in regenerated plants grown at 24 °C and were completely lacking at 29 °C and 34 °C (Figure 1e). Some calli grown at 37 °C showed abnormal development or death, and no plant data were obtained. Sanger sequencing results showed that the editing profiles at the first target were similar between plants grown under the different temperature treatments. The second target showed very low editing frequencies under 24 °C and 29 °C treatments, while at 34 °C, some editings were detected (Figure 1f). Hi-tom sequencing results also showed that all 10 plants at 24 °C were edited at one GhPGF locus in both the At and Dt subgenomes. At 29 °C and 34 °C, 6/10 and 10/10 plants were mutated at four loci of GhPGF, with editing efficiencies at the GhPGF-crRNA1 site of 15.2% (24 °C), 86.5% (29 °C) and 91.5% (34 °C), and at the GhPGF-crRNA2 site, 13.6% (24 °C), 12.1% (29 °C) and 67.6% (34 °C) (Figure 1c). Correspondingly, both T0 and T1 plants produced glandless bolls, leaves and seeds (Figure 1g). Compared with the expression level at normal temperature (24 °C), transcription of LbCpf1 in transgenic plants was found to be highest at 34 °C (Figure 1h). In order to obtain both glandless and transgene-free plants, T1 plants were obtained by selfing T0 homozygous plants. The LbCpf1 gene was detected by PCR, and the target editing types of GhPGF gene were detected by Sanger sequencing. Two transgene-free T1 plants with the target mutations (Cpgf-1, Cpgf-2) were obtained (Figure 1i), and both plants are glandless. Sequencing demonstrated that no off-target mutations were detected in any predicted off-target sites (Figure 1j). The results presented demonstrate that 34 °C is the optimum temperature for active CRISPR/LbCpf1 in cotton, and the bleached, glandless phenotype facilitates analysis. More importantly, homozygous, nontransgenic and gossypol-free plants provide valuable new germplasm for molecular breeding programs. The opportunity is demonstrated for improved editing efficiency in cotton by simple heat treatment during seed sowing or plant tissue culture. This work was supported by grant from National R&D Project of Transgenic Crops of Ministry of Science and Technology (2019ZX08010-003, 2016ZX08010001-006) and National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFD0100203-9) of China. SX.J. and XL.Z. designed the project. B. L., S.J.L., F.Q.W., G.Y.W., QQ.W., ZP.X., L.S., L. Y., M.N.Z., H.S., DJ.Y., WF.G. and YQ.W. performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. SX.J., M.A. K.L. revised the manuscript. The authors declare no competing financial interests.