Frontiers in Neurology · 2020 · 113 citations · 24 references
MedicineNeurologyRehabilitation MedicineNeurorehabilitationRehabilitationStroke RehabilitationDisability EvaluationMotor RecoveryNeurological RehabilitationPhysical RehabilitationStrokeMotor RehabilitationOutcome MeasuresPatient Rehabilitation GoalsPost-stroke Motor RecoveryPost-stroke RecoveryRehabilitation Goals SettingRehabilitation Outcome MeasurementStroke Recovery Monitoring
Introduction: Outcome measures are key to tailor rehabilitation goals to the stroke patient's individual needs and to monitor poststroke recovery. The large number of available outcome measures leads to high variability in clinical use. Currently, an internationally agreed core set of motor outcome measures for clinical application is lacking. Therefore, the goal was to develop such a set to serve as a quality standard in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke. Methods: Outcome measures for the upper and lower extremities, and activities of daily living (ADL)/stroke-specific outcomes were identified and presented to stroke rehabilitation experts in an electronic Delphi study. In round 1, clinical feasibility and relevance of the outcome measures were rated on a 7-point Likert scale. In round 2, those rated at least as “relevant” and “feasible” were ranked within the body functions, activities, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health ( ICF ). Furthermore, measurement time points poststroke were indicated. In round 3, answers were reviewed in reference to overall results to reach final consensus. Results: In total, 119 outcome measures were presented to 33 experts from 18 countries. The recommended core set includes the Fugl–Meyer Motor Assessment and Action Research Arm Test for the upper extremity section; the Fugl–Meyer Motor Assessment, 10-m Walk Test, Timed-Up-and-Go, and Berg Balance Scale for the lower extremity section; and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index or Functional Independence Measure for the ADL/stroke-specific section. The Stroke Impact Scale was recommended spanning all ICF domains. Recommended measurement time points are days 2 ± 1 and 7; weeks 2, 4, and 12; 6 months poststroke and every following 6th month. Discussion and Conclusion: Agreement was found upon a set of nine outcome measures for application in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke, with seven measurement time points following the stages of poststroke recovery. This core set was specifically developed for clinical practice and distinguishes itself from initiatives for stroke rehabilitation research. The next challenge is to implement this clinical core set across the full stroke care continuum with the aim to improve the transparency, comparability, and quality of stroke rehabilitation at a regional, national, and international level.
24
Julie Bernhardt, Kathryn S. Hayward, Gert Kwakkel et al. · International Journal of Stroke · 2017 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Lidwine B. Mokkink, C.A.C. Prinsen, L.M. Bouter et al. · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · 2016 · 885 citations · Full text
Medicine, Health Services Administration, Health Assessment +16
Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018–2030
Bo Norrving, Jon Barrick, Antoni Dávalos et al. · European Stroke Journal · 2018 · 603 citations · Full text
Medicine, Health Policy, Neurology +17