Substance Abuse · 2020 · 24 citations · 22 references
NursingPsychiatryAdolescent HealthBehavioral HealthSubstance Use DisordersAddictionAddiction AssessmentAlcohol Use DisorderCannabis Use DisorderScreening EvaluationSubstance UseAdolescent Substance Use ScreeningAlcohol Use Disorder ScreeningBrief Intervention ScreeningScreensSensitivitySubstance Use Disorder DiagnosisSubstance Use Disorder ScreeningSubstance Use Screening
Background The Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI) tool was designed to identify substance use disorders in adolescents. We report the S2BI's sensitivity and specificity for identifying alcohol and cannabis use disorders (AUD and CUD) in adolescents presenting for primary care. Methods Participants aged 14–18 ( N = 517) completed an electronic survey, consisting of the S2BI, the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and anxiety and depression screens. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of the S2BI compared to the CIDI criterion standard, using past year “monthly” and “weekly or more” consumption of alcohol or marijuana as a threshold for AUD or CUD. Results Current AUD and CUD were present in 2.9% and 8.3% of the sample, respectively and severe AUD and CUD were present in 0.8% and 3.9%. The S2BI had 53.3% sensitivity and 94.2% specificity for identifying any AUD (PPV = 21.6%; NPV = 98.5%), and 81.4% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity for identifying any CUD (PPV = 47.9%; NPV = 98.2%). The same threshold had 100% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity for identifying moderate/severe AUD, and 90.0% sensitivity and 89.0% specificity for identifying moderate/severe CUD. Conclusions S2BI had excellent sensitivity and specificity for identifying moderate and severe AUD and CUD. Sensitivity decreased when mild AUD and CUD were included.
22
The Composite International Diagnostic Interview
Lee N. Robins · Archives of General Psychiatry · 1988 · 2.9K citations