BMC Neurology · 2020 · 113 citations · 37 references
MedicineBiostatisticsOncologyEpidemiologyGeriatric AssessmentSurvival AnalysisCancer BiomarkersMolecular Classification Of TumorsMolecular Tumor ProfilingRisk StratificationTumor ClassificationAge Group ClassificationCutoff PointsGlioma GradingLogistic RegressionMolecular Diagnostic MarkersMolecular Prognostic MarkersMolecular Risk MarkersPrognostic Value Of Grade
BACKGROUND: Age is associated with the prognosis of glioma patients, but there is no uniform standard of age-group classification to evaluate the prognosis of glioma patients. In this study, we aimed to establish an age group classification for risk stratification in glioma patients. METHODS: 1502 patients diagnosed with gliomas at Nanfang Hospital between 2000 and 2018 were enrolled. The WHO grade of glioma was used as a dependent variable to evaluate the effect of age on risk stratification. The evaluation model was established by logistic regression, and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value of the model was used to determine the optimal cutoff points for age-classification. The differences in gender, WHO grade, pathological subtype, tumor cell differentiation, tumor size, tumor location, and molecular markers between different age groups were analyzed. The molecular markers included GFAP, EMA, MGMT, P53, NeuN, Oligo2, EGFR, VEGF, IDH1, Ki-67, PR, CD3, H3K27M, TS, and 1p/19q status. RESULTS: The proportion of men with glioma was higher than that of women with glioma (58.3% vs 41.7%). Analysis of age showed that appropriate classifications of age group were 0-14 years old (pediatric group), 15-47 years old (youth group), 48-63 years old (middle-aged group), and ≥ 64 years old (elderly group).The proportions of glioblastoma and large tumor size (4-6 cm) increased with age (p = 0.000, p = 0.018, respectively). Analysis of the pathological molecular markers across the four age groups showed that the proportion of patients with larger than 10% area of Ki-67 expression or positive PR expression increased with age (p = 0.000, p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate classifications of the age group for risk stratification are 0-14 years old (pediatric group), 15-47 years old (young group), 48-63 years old (middle age group) and ≥ 64 years old (elderly group). This age group classification is effective in evaluating the risk of glioblastoma in glioma patients.
37
Roel G.W. Verhaak, Katherine A. Hoadley, Elizabeth Purdom et al. · Cancer Cell · 2010 · 7.7K citations · Full text
<i>MGMT</i> Gene Silencing and Benefit from Temozolomide in Glioblastoma
Monika E. Hegi, Annie‐Claire Diserens, Thierry Gorlia et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 7.3K citations · Full text
<i>IDH1</i>and<i>IDH2</i>Mutations in Gliomas
Hai Yan, D. Williams Parsons, Genglin Jin et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 5.9K citations · Full text
Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma
Jeremy Schwartzentruber, Andrey Korshunov, Xiao-Yang Liu et al. · Nature · 2012 · 2.7K citations