arXiv (Cornell University) · 2020 · 25 citations · 10 references
ComputingComputer ScienceData ScienceArtificial IntelligenceDiscriminationMachine LearningAlgorithmic FairnessArtificial Intelligence GovernanceArtificial Intelligence PolicyBiasFairness In Machine LearningSocial EquityBias DetectionBias In Algorithmic SystemsBias MitigationDiscrimination In Automated Decision-makingDiscriminatory AttitudesFairnessFairness ConstraintsMachine Learning Ethics
Artificial Intelligence has the potential to exacerbate societal bias and set back decades of advances in equal rights and civil liberty. Data used to train machine learning algorithms may capture social injustices, inequality or discriminatory attitudes that may be learned and perpetuated in society. Attempts to address this issue are rapidly emerging from different perspectives involving technical solutions, social justice and data governance measures. While each of these approaches are essential to the development of a comprehensive solution, often discourse associated with each seems disparate. This paper reviews ongoing work to ensure data justice, fairness and bias mitigation in AI systems from different domains exploring the interrelated dynamics of each and examining whether the inevitability of bias in AI training data may in fact be used for social good. We highlight the complexity associated with defining policies for dealing with bias. We also consider technical challenges in addressing issues of societal bias.
10
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A. Friedler, John Moeller et al. · 2015 · 1.8K citations
Review of “Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code”
Marie Jipguep-Akhtar · Social Forces · 2019 · 1.5K citations
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Zou et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2016 · 1.4K citations · Full text