Journal of Translational Medicine · 2020 · 38 citations · 40 references
MedicineMolecular GeneticsOncologyCancer GeneticsGenomicsMolecular OncologyCancer GenomicsCancer Molecular DiagnosticsCirculating Tumor Dna AnalysisDna SequencingMolecular Tumor ProfilingMutation AnalysisCirculating Tumor Dna SequencingExome SequencingHotspot MutationsTumor Exome SequencingTumor Mutation DetectionTumor Mutational ProfilingTumor ProfilingTumor Progression Monitoring
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a convenient way to monitor tumor progression and treatment response. Because tumor mutational profiles are highly variable from person to person, a fixed content panel may be insufficient to track treatment response in all patients. METHODS: We design ctDNA fingerprint panels specific to individual patients which are based on whole exome sequencing and target to high frequency clonal population clusters in patients. We test the fingerprint panels in 313 patients who together have eight tumor types (colorectal, hepatocellular, gastric, breast, pancreatic, and esophageal carcinomas and lung cancer and cholangiocarcinoma) and exposed to multiple treatment methods (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted-drug therapy, immunotherapy, and combinations of them). We also monitor drug-related mutations in the patients using a pre-designed panel with eight hotspot genes. RESULTS: 291 (93.0%) designed fingerprint panels harbor less than ten previously known tumor genes. We detected 7475 ctDNA mutations in 238 (76%) patients and 6196 (96.0%) of the mutations are detected in only one test. Both the level of ctDNA content fraction (CCF) and fold change of CCF (between the definitive and proceeding tests) are highly correlated with clinical outcomes (p-values 1.36e-6 for level and 5.64e-10 for fold change, Kruskal-Wallis test). The CCFs of PD patients are an order of magnitude higher than the CCFs of SD and OR patients (median/mean 2.22%/8.96% for SD, 0.18/0.21% for PD, and 0.31/0.54% for OR; pairwise p-values 7.8e-6 for SD ~ PD, 2.7e-4 for OR ~ PD, and 7.0e-3 for SD ~ OR, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The fold change of CCF distinguishes the patient groups even better, which increases for PD, remains stable for SD, and decreases for OR patients (p-values 0.002, ~ 1, and 0.0001 respectively, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Eleven drug-related mutations are identified from nine out of the 313 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ctDNA fingerprint method improves both specificity and sensitivity of monitoring treatment response across several tumor types. It can identify tumor relapse/recurrence potentially earlier than imaging-based diagnosis. When augmented with tumor hotspot genes, it can track acquired drug-related mutations in patients.
40
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Heng Li, Alec Wysoker, Tim Fennell et al. · Bioinformatics · 2009 · 67.5K citations · Full text
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform
Heng Li, Richard Durbin · Bioinformatics · 2009 · 62.8K citations · Full text
A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
Mark A. DePristo, Eric Banks, Ryan Poplin et al. · Nature Genetics · 2011 · 12.4K citations · Full text
The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor
William McLaren, Laurent Gil, Sarah Hunt et al. · Genome biology · 2016 · 8.7K citations · Full text
VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing
Daniel C. Koboldt, Qunyuan Zhang, David E. Larson et al. · Genome Research · 2012 · 5.3K citations · Full text