THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY · 2020 · 10 citations · 13 references
DentistryMicrobiologyRestorative DentistryDental MaterialsOral MicrobiologySurface Properties Of Dental MaterialsBacterial BiofilmsBioceramicsBiofilm FormationMicrobial BiofilmsSurface FinishingSurface RoughnessAtomic Force Microscopy MetrologyAtomic Force Microscopy RoughnessBacterial Adhesion MechanismsBiofilm Formation On DenturesBiofilm Surface PropertiesComposite Resin Surface CharacteristicsMaterial Surface FinishSurface Roughness Parameters
This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the surface roughness and microbial adhesion to alkasite restorative material (Cention N), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and composite resin. And to examine the correlation between bacterial adhesion and surface roughness by different finishing systems.<br/>Specimens were fabricated in disk shapes and divided into four groups by finishing methods (control, carbide bur, fine grit diamond bur, and white stone bur). Surface roughness was tested by atomic force microscope and surface observation was performed by scanning electron microscope. Colony forming units were measured after incubating Streptococcus mutans biofilm on specimens using CDC biofilm reactor.<br/>Cention N surface roughness was less than 0.2 μm after finishing procedure. Control specimens of resin and Cention N specimens were significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.01) rougher. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC = 0.13) indicated a weak correlation between surface roughness and <i>S. mutans</i> adhesion to the specimens.<br/>Compared with resin specimens, RMGI and Cention N showed lower microbial adhesion. Surface roughness and bacterial adhesion were not significantly different, regardless of the finishing systems.
13
Ramesh Bharti, KulvinderKaur Wadhwani, AseemPrakash Tikku et al. · Journal of Conservative Dentistry · 2010 · 117 citations · Full text
Dentistry, Dental Materials Science, Restorative Dentistry +15