Urban Water Journal · 2020 · 64 citations · 39 references
ComputingData ScienceWater Resources ManagementDemand ForecastingForecastingMachine LearningEnsemble ForecastingEnsemble MethodsReal-time ForecastingTime Series ForecastingExtreme Gradient BoostingGradient BoostingLinear ModelsRandom ForestsReal ConsumptionStackingWater Demand ForecastingXgboost
Water demand forecasting is an essential task for water utilities, with increasing importance due to future societal and environmental changes. This paper suggests a new methodology for water demand forecasting, based on model stacking and bias correction that predicts daily demands for groups of ~120 properties. This methodology is compared to a number of models (Artificial Neural Networks – ANNs, Generalised Linear Models – GLMs, Random Forests – RFs, Gradient Boosting Machines – GBMs, Extreme Gradient Boosting – XGBoost, and Deep Neural Networks – DNNs), using real consumption data from the UK, collected at 15–30 minute intervals from 1,793 properties. Results show that the newly proposed stacked model that comprises of RFs, GBMs, DNNs, and GLMs consistently outperformed other water demand forecasting techniques (peak R2 = 74.1%). The stacked model’s accuracy on peak consumption days further improved by applying a bias correction method on the model’s output.
39
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.
Jerome H. Friedman · The Annals of Statistics · 2001 · 29K citations · Full text
Pierre Geurts, Damien Ernst, Louis Wehenkel · Machine Learning · 2006 · 8.7K citations · Full text
Junliang Fan, Xiukang Wang, Lifeng Wu et al. · Energy Conversion and Management · 2018 · 635 citations