PLoS ONE · 2020 · 36 citations · 25 references
MedicineOncologyBreast OncologyChemotherapyMolecular OncologyBreast Cancer OncologyBreast PathologyBreast Cancer Molecular SubtypesBreast Cancer PrognosisBreast Core Needle BiopsyEstrogen Receptor ExpressionEstrogen Receptor StatusKi-67 ImmunostainingPost-neoadjuvant TherapyProgesterone Receptor Status
PURPOSE: To investigate whether estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki-67 expression discordance before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) correlates with prognosis and treatment of breast cancer patients. METHODS: The study cohort included 482 breast cancer patients at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. Core needle biopsies and excised tissue biopsies pre- and post-NAC were obtained. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine ER, PR and Ki-67 status. The relationship between biomarker discordance before and after NAC and clinicopathological features was compared retrospectively. RESULTS: ER (n = 482), PR (n = 482) and Ki-67 (n = 448) expression was assessed in the same lesion pre- and post-NAC. Discordance in the three markers pre- and post-NAC was observed in 50 (10.4%), 82 (17.0%) and 373 (77.4%) cases, respectively. Positive-to-negative PR expression changes were the most common type of discordance observed. The risk of death in patients with a PR positive-to-negative conversion was 6.58 times greater than for patients with stable PR expression. The risk of death in patients with increased Ki-67 expression following NAC treatment was 2.05 times greater than for patients with stable Ki-67 expression. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients showed changes in ER, PR and/or Ki-67 status throughout NAC, and these changes possibly influenced disease-free survival and overall survival. A switch to negative hormone receptor expression with increased Ki-67 expression following NAC could be indicators of a worse prognosis. Biomarker expression investigations following NAC may potentially improve patient management and survival.
25
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Antonio C. Wolff, M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Jared N. Schwartz et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2006 · 4.5K citations · Full text
Aron Goldhirsch, W. C. Wood, Alan S. Coates et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2011 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +16
Aron Goldhirsch, Eric P. Winer, Alan S. Coates et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2013 · 3.7K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +10