EClinicalMedicine · 2020 · 24 citations · 13 references
Public HealthPharmacokineticsPharmacologyClinical PharmacologyHiv PreventionPharmacovigilanceAntiretroviral TherapyAntiviral TherapyHuman Immunodeficiency Virus PharmacotherapyInjection SafetyPre-exposure ProphylaxisPrevention Of Sexual TransmissionAdherenceAntiviral Safety AssessmentHiv Pre-exposure ProphylaxisHiv Preexposure ProphylaxisLong-acting Injectable Pre-exposure ProphylaxisPre-exposure Prophylaxis AdherencePre-exposure Prophylaxis Among People Who Inject DrugsPre-exposure Prophylaxis Safety
BACKGROUND: Daily oral TDF/FTC is protective against HIV infection when used for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). However, daily adherence to oral PrEP is difficult for many; therefore, finding alternative PrEP strategies remains a priority. HPTN 076 evaluated the long-acting injectable form of rilpivirine (RPV), known as RPV LA for safety, pharmacokinetics and acceptability. METHODS: HPTN 076 (NTC 02165202) was a phase 2, double-blind, 2:1 randomized trial comparing the safety of 1200mg RPV LA (LA) to placebo (P). The study included a 28-day oral run-in phase of daily, self- administered oral RPV (25 mg), with directly observed oral dosing about six times. Of 136 enrolled sexually active, HIV-uninfected, low HIV-risk African (100) and US (36) adult women, injectable product was administered in two gluteal, intramuscular (IM) injections once every eight weeks to 122 participants following the oral run-in phase. A maximum of six injection time points occurred over a 48-week period. Acceptability, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) data were collected throughout the study. This paper includes primary endpoint data collected up to the week 52 post enrollment. FINDINGS: was 75.0 ng/mL. At the last injection visit (Week 44), 80 % of women who answered acceptability questions strongly agreed that they would think about using- and 68% that they would definitely use a PrEP injectable in the future. INTERPRETATION: RPV LA IM injections every eight weeks in African and US women were safe and acceptable. Overall, despite more injection site reactions and pain in the participants receiving RPV LA the injections were well tolerated. Data from this study support the further development of injectable PrEP agents.
13
David A. Margolis, Juan González‐García, Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink et al. · The Lancet · 2017 · 504 citations
Jean‐Michel Molina, Pedro Cahn, Beatriz Grinsztejn et al. · The Lancet · 2011 · 401 citations
Mackenzie L. Cottrell, Kuo H. Yang, Heather M. A. Prince et al. · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2016 · 299 citations · Full text
Hilde Azijn, Ilse Tirry, Johan Vingerhoets et al. · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2009 · 294 citations · Full text
Gerben van ‘t Klooster, Eva Hoeben, Herman Borghys et al. · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2010 · 186 citations · Full text