Scientific Reports · 2020 · 51 citations · 23 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryGastrointestinal OncologySurgical OncologySurvival AnalysisCancer StagingCancer Survival AnalysisColorectal CancerColorectal SurgeryMalignant NeoplasmsPrognostic AssessmentColorectal Cancer PrognosisPrognostic ClassificationPrognostic IndicesR0 ResectionTnm Staging System
Increasing evidence advocates the prognostic role of RDW in various tumours. We analysed 591 patients to assess whether RDW is a prognostic factor for overall (OS) and cancer-related survival (CRS) for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The data were retrieved from a retrospective database. The optimal cut-off value for RDW was set at 14.1%; accordingly, two groups were considered: those with a value equal or lower than 14.1% (L-RDW), and those with a value higher than 14.1% (H-RDW). The mean value of RDW rose from pT1 to pT4 tumours. H-RDW correlated with age above the mean, colonic location of the lesion, pT and TNM stage. Finally, H-RDW was significantly associated with the intent of surgery: almost 50% of patients who underwent a non-curative resection presented H-RDW, compared to 19.3% in R0 resections. OS was significantly lower in patients with H-RDW. CRS was similar in the two groups. Stratifying patients according to TNM stage worse OS was associated with H-RDW only in early stages, whereas there was no difference for stages II-IV. Multivariate analysis confirmed that H-RDW was not an independent prognostic factor. Although H-RDW correlated with some negative clinical-pathological factors, it did not seem to independently influence OS and CRS.
23
Effector Memory T Cells, Early Metastasis, and Survival in Colorectal Cancer
Franck Pagès, Anne Berger, Matthieu Camus et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 2.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Immunology, Oncology +17