A primer on model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion

Stéphanie Portet

Infectious Disease Modelling · 2020 · 487 citations · 23 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

In biology, researchers use collections of mathematical models to test hypotheses and select the best one, requiring model calibration and selection based on observations. These lecture notes describe the typical workflow for using mathematical models in biology and motivate employing a collection of models. The notes explain how to calibrate models and apply the Akaike Information Criterion, including its derivation, computation, and practical use.

Abstract

A powerful investigative tool in biology is to consider not a single mathematical model but a collection of models designed to explore different working hypotheses and select the best model in that collection. In these lecture notes, the usual workflow of the use of mathematical models to investigate a biological problem is described and the use of a collection of model is motivated. Models depend on parameters that must be estimated using observations; and when a collection of models is considered, the best model has then to be identified based on available observations. Hence, model calibration and selection, which are intrinsically linked, are essential steps of the workflow. Here, some procedures for model calibration and a criterion, the Akaike Information Criterion, of model selection based on experimental data are described. Rough derivation, practical technique of computation and use of this criterion are detailed.

References

23