Nature Communications · 2020 · 362 citations · 49 references
Life SciencesBiochemistryMass Spectrometric AnalysisProtein BiochemistryProteomicsBottom-up ProteomicsMass Spectrometry Data AnalysisMass Spectrometry-based ProteomicsPeptide AnalysisProtein IdentificationQuantitative ProteomicsProtein Mass SpectrometryProteomic Data AnalysisReproducibility AssessmentTandem Mass Spectrometry
Nano‑flow LC–MS/MS is the standard for proteomics due to its high sensitivity, though it often sacrifices robustness. The 1 × 150 mm micro‑flow LC–MS/MS system identifies >9 000 proteins and >120 000 peptides in 16 h, detects >30 000 phosphopeptides in 12 h, and analyzes protein‑protein or protein‑drug interactions in 20 min per sample, with tandem‑mass‑tag multiplexing raising throughput to 11 proteomes per 16 h. Micro‑flow LC–MS/MS delivers <0.3 % retention‑time CV and <7.5 % protein‑quantification CV across >2000 samples, supports analysis of >7500 samples without performance loss, and is suitable for diverse proteomic applications.
Abstract Nano-flow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nano-flow LC–MS/MS) is the mainstay in proteome research because of its excellent sensitivity but often comes at the expense of robustness. Here we show that micro-flow LC–MS/MS using a 1 × 150 mm column shows excellent reproducibility of chromatographic retention time (<0.3% coefficient of variation, CV) and protein quantification (<7.5% CV) using data from >2000 samples of human cell lines, tissues and body fluids. Deep proteome analysis identifies >9000 proteins and >120,000 peptides in 16 h and sample multiplexing using tandem mass tags increases throughput to 11 proteomes in 16 h. The system identifies >30,000 phosphopeptides in 12 h and protein-protein or protein-drug interaction experiments can be analyzed in 20 min per sample. We show that the same column can be used to analyze >7500 samples without apparent loss of performance. This study demonstrates that micro-flow LC–MS/MS is suitable for a broad range of proteomic applications.
49
Laurens van der Maaten, Geoffrey E. Hinton · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2008 · 35.7K citations
Damian Szklarczyk, Annika L. Gable, David Lyon et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2018 · 19.2K citations · Full text