Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · 2019 · 12 citations · 17 references
Health ProfessionsHealth LawClinical Decision SupportHealthcare PolicyMedical EthicsAdvance DirectivesEnd-of-life Decision MakingInformed Decision-makingAdvance Care PlanningAdvance Directive InterpretationAdvance Directive RevocationBenefit-risk RatioEnd-of-life Treatment RefusalInformed Consent LawRevocation Of Advance DirectivesRisk-benefit Ratio Assessment
Advance directives entail a refusal expressed by a still-healthy patient. Three consequences stem from that fact: (a) advance refusal is unspecific, since it is impossible to predict what the patient's conditions and the risk-benefit ratio may be in the foreseeable future; (b) those decisions cannot be as well informed as those formulated while the disease is in progress; (c) while both current consent and refusal can be revoked as the disease unfolds, until the treatment starts out, advance directives become effective when the patient becomes incapable or unconscious; such decisions can therefore not be revoked at any stage of the disease. Therefore, advance directives are binding for doctors only at the stage of advance treatment planning, i.e., only if they refer to an illness already in progress.
17
Advance Directives as Acts of Communication
Peter H. Ditto, Joseph H. Danks, William D. Smucker et al. · Archives of Internal Medicine · 2001 · 411 citations
Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics
JAMA · 2008 · 126 citations · Full text
Medicine, Otolaryngology, Psychiatry +10
Pauline S. C. Kouwenhoven, Natasja Raijmakers, Johannes J. M. van Delden et al. · BMC Medical Ethics · 2015 · 57 citations · Full text