Global Purchasing as Labor Regulation: The Missing Middle

Matthew Amengual, Greg Distelhorst, Danny Tobin

Industrial and Labor Relations Review · 2019 · 86 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study investigates whether purchasing practices support or undermine labor standard regulation in global supply chains. The authors analyze factory labor audit records linked to purchase order microdata to map regulatory efforts across the supply chain. The retailer successfully improved factory compliance and terminated noncompliant suppliers, yet higher labor standards did not attract more orders and factories with declining standards actually received more orders, indicating that the lack of supplier flexibility—not cost advantages—impedes order reallocation in response to compliance findings.

Abstract

Do purchasing practices support or undermine the regulation of labor standards in global supply chains? This study offers the first analysis of the full range of supply chain regulatory efforts, integrating records of factory labor audits with purchase order microdata. Studying an apparel and equipment retailer with a strong reputation for addressing labor conditions in its suppliers, the authors show that the retailer persuaded factories to improve and terminated factories with poor labor compliance. However, the authors also find that purchase orders did not increase when labor standards improved. If anything, factories whose standards worsened tended to see their orders increase. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, this “missing middle” in incentives for compliance appears unrelated to any cost advantage of noncompliant factories. Instead, lack of flexibility in supplier relationships created obstacles to reallocating orders in response to compliance findings.

References

17