Publication | Closed Access
Multi-Connectivity as an Enabler for Reliable Low Latency Communications—An Overview
140
Citations
52
References
2019
Year
Wireless CommunicationsCross-layer OptimizationEngineeringUltra-reliable Low-latency CommunicationEdge ComputingComputer EngineeringStrict RequirementsSystems EngineeringVehicle NetworkDelay-tolerant NetworkingLow LatencyInternet Of ThingsMulti-hop RoutingReliable Low-latency CommunicationUltra-low LatencyWireless Industrial ControlMedium Access ControlNetwork Connectivity
Emerging industrial and vehicular applications demand ultra‑low latency and high reliability, yet current standards fall short, making multi‑connectivity a promising solution. This survey defines multi‑connectivity, categorises scheduling schemes, compares network architectures, reviews layer‑specific implementations, and outlines open research questions and future directions. The authors review established IEEE and 3GPP multi‑connectivity methods, analyse scheduling categories and network architectures, and discuss recent layer‑by‑layer approaches to guide future research.
Emerging applications such as wireless industrial control or vehicular communications pose strict requirements in terms of latency and reliability on wireless communication systems. Since contemporary communication standards are not able to fulfill all of these requirements, reliable low-latency communication is an important research topic. Using multiple communication paths at once, i.e., multi-connectivity (MC), is a promising approach to get closer to reaching this goal of reliable low-latency communication. In this survey we provide a definition for MC, identify main scheduling categories, compare different network architectures and consider different layers for implementing MC. We provide an overview of MC methods already established in IEEE and 3GPP standardization and discuss recent MC approaches on a layer-by-layer basis. Moreover, we reflect on the existing literature and identify open issues. We suggest further research directions such as the OSI Layer where separation and aggregation of the different paths for MC is performed, the characteristics of the paths to be used for MC and dynamic scheduling techniques for MC settings.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1