Publication | Open Access
Conventional and High-Sensitivity Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Performance in Two Transmission Settings: Haiti 2017
35
Citations
26
References
2019
Year
ImmunohematologyMalariaDiagnosisPlasmodium FalciparumParasite GenomicsVector Borne DiseaseAccurate Malaria DiagnosisDiagnostic TestBioanalysisClinical EpidemiologyHematologyHaiti 2017Serologic TestingClinical ChemistryPublic HealthLaboratory MedicineMolecular DiagnosticsParasitologyInfectious Disease EpidemiologyMalaria EliminationEpidemiologyMedical DiagnosticsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesGlobal HealthParasite ControlDisease TransmissionMedicineTransmission Settings
Accurate malaria diagnosis is foundational for control and elimination, and Haiti relies on histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) identifying Plasmodium falciparum in clinical and community settings. In 2017, 1 household and 2 easy-access group surveys tested all participants (N = 32 506) by conventional and high-sensitivity RDTs. A subset of blood samples (n = 1154) was laboratory tested for HRP2 by bead-based immunoassay and for P. falciparum 18S rDNA by photo-induced electron transfer polymerase chain reaction. Both RDT types detected low concentrations of HRP2 with sensitivity estimates between 2.6 ng/mL and 14.6 ng/mL. Compared to the predicate HRP2 laboratory assay, RDT sensitivity ranged from 86.3% to 96.0% between tests and settings, and specificity from 90.0% to 99.6%. In the household survey, the high-sensitivity RDT provided a significantly higher number of positive tests, but this represented a very small proportion (<0.2%) of all participants. These data show that a high-sensitivity RDT may have limited utility in a malaria elimination setting like Haiti.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1