Journal of Ethnobiology · 2019 · 20 citations · 10 references
LawIntellectual Property LawInternational LawIndigenous StudiesIntellectual PropertyProperty RightsIndigenous KnowledgeIndigenous RightsIntellectual Property PolicyIntellectual Property ProtectionIntellectual Property RightsInternational Intellectual Property LawExceptions To Intellectual Property RightsIndigenous Intellectual Property RightsIntellectual Property LimitationsIntellectual Property RegulationIntellectual Property Rights OfInternational Public PolicyLimitations To Intellectual Property RightsRegulatory Scrutiny
Following the 1988 International Congress of Ethnobiology, at which the Belém Declaration had been adopted, Darrell Posey published a global call to action for researchers and policy makers to address outstanding issues related to the protection of Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) (1990a). ILK protections are today largely treated as a matter of intellectual property rights, a field whose global political landscape has undergone intense regulation and critical scrutiny since the time at which Posey was writing. This paper provides an update on the state of intellectual property policy as it relates to the “just compensation” of Indigenous and local communities, while also addressing how global bodies and various national governments have grappled with Posey's suggestions. Additionally, we highlight how the shortcomings of national and international policy to address outstanding issues related to intellectual property have affected cultural, ecological, and biological conservation. In conclusion, an update to Posey's suggestions is offered in light of the Belém +30 Congress (August 7–10, 2018) and of ongoing developments in intellectual property policy.
10
Indigenous People Incorporated?
Shane Greene · Current Anthropology · 2004 · 136 citations
Simone Athayde, John Richard Stepp, Wemerson Chimello Ballester · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · 2016 · 57 citations · Full text