Copy-number variation contributes 9% of pathogenicity in the inherited retinal degenerations

Erin Zampaglione, Benyam Kinde, Emily Place, Daniel Navarro-Gomez, Matthew Maher, Farzad Jamshidi, Sherwin Nassiri, J. Alex Mazzone, Caitlin Finn, Dana Schlegel,

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019 · 14 citations · 73 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Current sequencing strategies can genetically solve 55-60% of inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) cases, despite recent progress in sequencing. This can partially be attributed to elusive pathogenic variants (PVs) in known IRD genes, including copy number variations (CNVs), which we believe are a major contributor to unsolved IRD cases. Methods Five hundred IRD patients were analyzed with targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). The NGS data was used to detect CNVs with ExomeDepth and gCNV and the results were compared to CNV detection with a SNP-Array. Likely causal CNV predictions were validated by quantitative (q)PCR. Results Likely disease-causing single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small indels were found in 55.8% of subjects. PVs in USH2A (11.6%), RPGR (4%) and EYS (4%) were the most common. Likely causal CNVs were found in an additional 8.8% of patients. Of the three CNV detection methods, gCNV showed the highest accuracy. Approximately 30% of unsolved subjects had a single likely PV in a recessive IRD gene. Conclusions CNV detection using NGS-based algorithms is a reliable method that greatly increases the genetic diagnostic rate of IRDs. Experimentally validating CNVs helps estimate the rate at which IRDs might be solved by a CNV plus a more elusive variant.

References

73