MIS Quarterly · 2019 · 477 citations · 140 references
The sociotechnical perspective is often seen as one of the foundational viewpoints—or an “axis of cohesion”— for the Information Systems (IS) discipline, contributing to both its distinctiveness and its ability to coherently expand its boundaries. However, our review of papers in the two leading IS journals from 2000 to 2016 suggests that IS research has lost sight of the discipline’s sociotechnical character—a character that was widely acknowledged at the discipline’s inception. This is a problem because an axis of cohesion can be fundamental to a discipline’s long-term vitality. In order to address this issue, we offer ways to renew the sociotechnical perspective so that it can continue to serve as a distinctive and coherent foundation for the discipline. Our hope is that the renewed sociotechnical frame for the IS discipline discussed in the paper holds potential to contribute to the enduring strength of our diverse, distinctive, yet unified discipline. It also prompts members of the discipline to think more deeply about what it means to be an IS scholar.
140
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, March March, Jinsoo Park et al. · MIS Quarterly · 2004 · 9.4K citations
Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact
Chen, Chiang, Storey · MIS Quarterly · 2012 · 5.9K citations
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Dale L. Goodhue, Ronald L. Thompson · MIS Quarterly · 1995 · 5.5K citations