New Biotechnology · 2019 · 25 citations · 34 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyMolecular DiagnosticsMolecular OncologyMolecular PathologyBiopsy TechniquesDna SequencingNext-generation Sequencing In OncologyClinical Next-generation SequencingDna ExtractionExtraction From Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded SamplesFormalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue AnalysisMetricsMolecular Diagnosis From Tissue SamplesTissue Sample Collection
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses on DNA derived from archived Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) clinical material can provide a powerful tool in oncology research and clinical diagnostics. Although several studies have established that NGS can be performed using DNA from FFPE tissue, the accuracy and reproducibility of such analyses, as well as their robustness to the biomolecular quality of the samples used, remains a matter of debate. Excellent reviews have recently been published, providing evidence-based best practices for FFPE DNA extraction. Alternative fixatives exist, although their implementation in clinical practice is difficult. In this article, we present (i) a review of fixed tissue DNA preanalytics with a special focus on DNA extraction and fixed tissue sample qualification and (ii) results from comparisons between different methods of DNA extraction from tissue samples that have been fixed or stabilized by different methods, in terms of NGS metrics and different DNA quality metrics.
34
The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project
John N. Weinstein, Gordon B. Mills, Kenna Shaw et al. · Nature Genetics · 2013 · 9.5K citations · Full text
DNA damage is a pervasive cause of sequencing errors, directly confounding variant identification
Lixin Chen, Pingfang Liu, Thomas C. Evans et al. · Science · 2017 · 263 citations