Science and Public Policy · 2019 · 13 citations · 43 references
Public AffairsEnvironmental SciencesEnvironmental GovernanceInstitutional TheoryScience PolicyEcosystem GovernanceEcosystem Service GovernanceEcosystem Services ManagementResearch GovernanceResearch PolicyScience GovernanceAcademic KnowledgeEcosystem ServicesFoucauldian TheoryScience InstitutionsScientific Research Governance
Abstract Despite the abundant literature on transformation of research and the affective dimension of research practice, affective governing of research has not been documented to the same extent. To address this gap, we examine how scientific research can be affectively governed by research institutions. We focus on the case of ecosystem services science, an interdisciplinary field of research expected to lead to decisions capable of halting environmental degradation. Drawing on theoretical discussions bridging the concept of affect and the Foucauldian concept of government, we argue that affects can be mobilised as a technology of government in governing scientific practice. We identify three affective techniques used to govern ecosystem service research and discuss the limits of governing research through affects. Our analysis deepens the understanding of how academic work is transformed in the context of redefined relations between science and society.
43
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Robert Costanza, Ralph C. d’Arge, R.S. de Groot et al. · Nature · 1997 · 22K citations
Natural Resources, Natural Resource Economics, Resource Economics +14