Making intrinsic values work; integrating intrinsic values of the more-than-human world through the Life Framework of Values

Seb O’Connor, Jasper O. Kenter

Sustainability Science · 2019 · 148 citations · 81 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Values are conceptualized as related to living with, from, in, and as the world, forming four Life Frames that differ from traditional ethical categories and distinguish the authors’ approach from rights‑based and utilitarian intrinsic value theories. The study proposes a novel Life Framework that treats intrinsic values as ends independent of human valuers, aiming to integrate them with ecosystem services and NCP to bridge and reconcile different value types. The framework bundles intrinsic, relational, and ecosystem service values within the Life Framework, employs more‑than‑human participatory research and post‑normal science, and demonstrates its application through an integrated marine ecosystem valuation linking intrinsic and relational values to the four Life Frames. Applying the framework enhances recognition and procedural justice of valuation while preserving the practical benefits of the ecosystem services approach.

Abstract

This paper addresses central limitations of ecosystem services and nature's contributions to people (NCP) by developing a novel approach to consideration of intrinsic values of nature. Intrinsic values are seen as bundled with values of ecosystem services and NCP within the Life Framework, an innovative, comprehensive and easy to communicate framework of values. Building on work by John O'Neill, values are conceived of as related to living with, from, in and as the world. These frames are related to but distinct from more formal ethical justifications of intrinsic, instrumental and relational values, which straddle the four Life Frames. Focusing on intrinsic values, we conceive these as ends without reference to humans as valuers, but which nonetheless can be articulated by people. We draw on more-than-human participatory research and post-normal science to promote the articulation and deliberation of perspectives and interests of the more-than-human world by an extended peer community. This clearly differentiates our approach from both rights-based intrinsic value and utilitarian existence value approaches, although it is inclusive of them. The approach is demonstrated by an elaborate integrated marine ecosystem valuation, where we investigate associations between intrinsic and relational values and the four Life frames. The Life Framework, operationalised through the post-normal, more-than-human participatory approach, operationalises articulated intrinsic values in a way that puts them on an equal footing with values of ecosystem services and NCP, providing an opportunity to bridge and reconcile these different types of value through deliberation. This enhances the recognition and procedural justice of valuation, while at the same time retaining the practical advantages that the ecosystem services framework brings.

References

81