Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · 2008 · 95 citations · 58 references
ManagementTechnology ManagementIntellectual PropertyIntellectual Property ManagementPatent LawClassificationIntellectual Property Portfolio ManagementInternational Patent LawPatent AnalysisPatent Cooperation Treaty ProcedurePatent Portfolio ManagementComparability Of Country-level DataPatent BibliometricsPatent Classification Systems
The study aims to analyze and visualize technological relations via patent co‑classifications and to assess whether title‑word mapping offers a better visualization of intellectual organization. Using 138,751 2006 PCT patents, the authors performed co‑classification analysis on IPC 3‑ and 4‑digit codes to map technological relationships at multiple aggregation levels. Co‑classification patterns proved weak and did not support mapping, and although country‑level specificity emerged, advanced countries’ patent portfolios were too similar for country units to be informative.
Abstract Using the 138,751 patents filed in 2006 under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, co‐classification analysis is pursued on the basis of three‐ and four‐digit codes in the International Patent Classification (IPC, 8th ed.). The co‐classifications among the patents enable us to analyze and visualize the relations among technologies at different levels of aggregation. The hypothesis that classifications might be considered as the organizers of patents into classes, and therefore that co‐classification patterns—more than co‐citation patterns—might be useful for mapping, is not corroborated. The classifications hang weakly together, even at the four‐digit level; at the country level, more specificity can be made visible. However, countries are not the appropriate units of analysis because patent portfolios are largely similar in many advanced countries in terms of the classes attributed. Instead of classes, one may wish to explore the mapping of title words as a better approach to visualize the intellectual organization of patents.
58
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel · Physics Today · 1963 · 35.5K citations
Humanities, History, Physics +17
A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness
Linton C. Freeman · Sociometry · 1977 · 10.2K citations
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS
J. E. McGuire · Philosophical Books · 1963 · 8.5K citations