ACM Transactions on Storage · 2019 · 16 citations · 58 references
ComputingComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceData StructuresDatabasesStorage SystemsHash TablesMemory ConsistencyMemory HierarchyMemory Hierarchy DesignMemory Hierarchy OptimizationData ConsistencyDynamic Random-access MemoryHash Table RehashingHashingIndex StructuresPersistent MemoryRandom-access MemoryResizable Hash Tables
Non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies as persistent memory are promising candidates to complement or replace DRAM for building future memory systems, due to having the advantages of high density, low power, and non-volatility. In main memory systems, hashing index structures are fundamental building blocks to provide fast query responses. However, hashing index structures originally designed for dynamic random access memory (DRAM) become inefficient for persistent memory due to new challenges including hardware limitations of NVM and the requirement of data consistency. To address these challenges, this article proposes level hashing , a write-optimized and high-performance hashing index scheme with low-overhead consistency guarantee and cost-efficient resizing. Level hashing provides a sharing-based two-level hash table, which achieves constant-scale worst-case time complexity for search, insertion, deletion, and update operations, and rarely incurs extra NVM writes. To guarantee the consistency with low overhead, level hashing leverages log-free consistency schemes for deletion, insertion, and resizing operations, and an opportunistic log-free scheme for update operation. To cost-efficiently resize this hash table, level hashing leverages an in-place resizing scheme that only needs to rehash 1/3 of buckets instead of the entire table to expand a hash table and rehash 2/3 of buckets to shrink a hash table, thus significantly improving the resizing performance and reducing the number of rehashed buckets. Extensive experimental results show that the level hashing speeds up insertions by 1.4×−3.0×, updates by 1.2×−2.1×, expanding by over 4.3×, and shrinking by over 1.4× while maintaining high search and deletion performance compared with start-of-the-art hashing schemes.
58
Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching
Jon Bentley · Communications of the ACM · 1975 · 7.5K citations · Full text
Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB
Brian F. Cooper, Adam Silberstein, Erwin Tam et al. · 2010 · 3.6K citations
2017 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC'17)
Do Le Quoc, Martin S. Beck, Pramod Bhatotia et al. · 2017 · 3.1K citations
H.‐S. Philip Wong, Simone Raoux, Sang‐Bum Kim et al. · Proceedings of the IEEE · 2010 · 1.8K citations