arXiv (Cornell University) · 2019 · 101 citations · 35 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine LearningMachine VisionAppearance EvaluationImage ClassificationObject DetectionObject RecognitionPattern RecognitionScene UnderstandingHousehold Income InequalityLow IncomeObject ClassificationObject Recognition Systems
The paper analyzes the accuracy of publicly available object-recognition systems on a geographically diverse dataset. This dataset contains household items and was designed to have a more representative geographical coverage than commonly used image datasets in object recognition. We find that the systems perform relatively poorly on household items that commonly occur in countries with a low household income. Qualitative analyses suggest the drop in performance is primarily due to appearance differences within an object class (e.g., dish soap) and due to items appearing in a different context (e.g., toothbrushes appearing outside of bathrooms). The results of our study suggest that further work is needed to make object-recognition systems work equally well for people across different countries and income levels.
35
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens van der Maaten et al. · 2017 · 44.7K citations
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su et al. · International Journal of Computer Vision · 2015 · 40.2K citations
George A. Miller · Communications of the ACM · 1995 · 14.1K citations · Full text