Toward a Psychological Framework of Radical Healing in Communities of Color

Bryana H. French, Jioni A. Lewis, Della V. Mosley, Hector Y. Adames, Nayeli Y. Chavez‐Dueñas, Grace A. Chen, Helen A. Neville

The Counseling Psychologist · 2019 · 448 citations · 66 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Race and racism in the United States adversely affect the overall well‑being of People of Color and Indigenous individuals. The study introduces a new psychological framework of radical healing for People of Color and Indigenous individuals that moves beyond individual‑level coping with racial trauma. The framework builds on social justice education, liberation psychology, Black psychology, ethnopolitical psychology, and intersectionality theory, and is organized around five anchors: collectivism, critical consciousness, radical hope, strength and resistance, and cultural authenticity and self‑knowledge. The authors discuss how radical healing can be applied in clinical practice, research, training, and social justice advocacy.

Abstract

Advancing beyond individual-level approaches to coping with racial trauma, we introduce a new psychological framework of radical healing for People of Color and Indigenous individuals (POCI) in the United States. We begin by providing a context of race and racism in the United States and its consequences for the overall well-being of POCI. We build on existing frameworks rooted in social justice education and activism and describe a form of healing and transformation that integrates elements of liberation psychology, Black psychology, ethnopolitical psychology, and intersectionality theory. We briefly review these conceptual foundations as a prelude to introducing a psychological framework of radical healing and its components grounded in five anchors including: (a) collectivism, (b) critical consciousness, (c) radical hope, (d) strength and resistance, and (e) cultural authenticity and self-knowledge. We conclude with a discussion of the applications of radical healing to clinical practice, research, training, and social justice advocacy.

References

66