BMC Cancer · 2019 · 102 citations · 31 references
PharmacyOncologyCancer Survivorship CareHealth AssessmentOutcomes ResearchCancer SurvivorshipHealth-related Quality Of LifeHealth-related Quality Of Life MeasurementHealth-state Utility MeasurementPatient-reported Outcome MeasuresQuality Of LifeCancer-related Quality Of LifeClinical Utility AssessmentCurrent Marital StatusHead Cancer SurvivorshipLow IncomePatient-reported Utility MeasurementSurvivorship Quality Of LifeUtility Measurement In Oncology
BACKGROUND: This study seeks to assess quality of life (QOL) and utility scores of head and neck cancer survivors. METHODS: We compared QOL as indicated by EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, utility scores by time trade off (TTO) with previous published reference values and tested series characteristics related to global QOL and utility. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients were recruited. Of the patients, 102 (80%) completed the utility assessment. Cancer survivors had lower scores compared with norm values. Patients without a spouse had a lower utility than those with a spouse. Patients with a low annual family income also had lower global QOL and utility scores (p < 0.05). Other factors were not significantly related to QOL and utility scores. CONCLUSION: Disease and treatment of head and neck cancer lead to disability and poor health-related QOL and utility. Economic status may contribute to health-related QOL and utility, while marital status is related to utility for head and neck cancer patients.
31
N.K. Aaronson, Sam H. Ahmedzai, Bengt Bergman et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1993 · 16K citations
Marital Status and Survival in Patients With Cancer
Ayal A. Aizer, Ming‐Hui Chen, Ellen P. McCarthy et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2013 · 1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Biostatistics, Oncology +17