The Oncologist · 2019 · 37 citations · 19 references
MedicineOncologyBreast OncologyMolecular OncologyPrecision OncologyAdjuvant TherapyBreast Cancer OncologyBreast Cancer RecurrenceBreast Cancer PrognosisEstrogen Receptor StatusHormone Receptor - Positive Breast CancerHormone Receptor-positive DiseaseHuman Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive DiseaseProgesterone Receptor StatusTreatment Decision-making SupportTreatment Recommendation
Abstract Background The ROXANE Italian prospective study evaluated the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) results on adjuvant treatment decision for patients with early breast cancer. Materials and Methods Nine centers participated. Physicians used the RS test whenever unsure about adjuvant treatment recommendation for patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative, T1–T3, N0–N1 early breast cancer. Pre-RS and post-RS treatment recommendations were collected. Results A total of 251 patients were included. N0 patients (61%) showed higher grade (p < .001) and higher Ki67 (p = .001) and were more frequently progesterone receptor negative (p = .012) as compared with N1 patients. RS results were as follows: <11, n = 63 (25.1%); 11–25, n = 143 (57%); and ≥26, n = 45 (17.9%). Higher RS was found in N0 vs. N1 patients (p = .001) and in cases of G3 (p < .001) and higher Ki67 (p < .001). The rate of change in treatment decision was 30% (n = 75), mostly from chemotherapy (CT) plus hormone therapy (CT + HT) to hormone therapy (HT; 76%, n = 57/75). The proportion of patients recommended to CT + HT was significantly reduced from pre-RS to post-RS (52% to 36%, p < .0001). CT use reduction was more evident for N1 patients (55% to 27%) than for N0 patients (50% to 42%) and was observed only in cases of RS ≤17. Conclusion Physicians predominantly used the 21-gene assay in N0 patients with a more aggressive biology or in N1 patients showing more indolent biology. In this selected patient population, the use of RS testing led to a 30% rate of change in treatment decision. In the N1 patient subgroup, the use of RS testing contributed to reduce CT use by more than half. Implications for Practice This study shows that, even in a context in which physicians recommend a high proportion of patients to endocrine treatment alone before knowing the results of the Recurrence Score (RS) assay, the use of the RS test, whenever uncertainty regarding adjuvant treatment recommendation is present, significantly contributes in further reducing the use of chemotherapy, especially for N1 patients.
19
A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Soonmyung Paik, Steven Shak, Gong Tang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2004 · 6.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +12
Antonio C. Wolff, M. Elizabeth Hammond, David G. Hicks et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2013 · 4.1K citations · Full text
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer
Joseph A. Sparano, Robert J. Gray, Della Makower et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 2.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Endocrinology, Oncology +17
70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Fátima Cardoso, Laura J. van’t Veer, Jan Bogaerts et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 2.1K citations · Full text
Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer
Joseph A. Sparano, Robert J. Gray, Della Makower et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +16