Biotechnology for Biofuels · 2019 · 26 citations · 31 references
Life SciencesBiotechnologyMicrobiologyIndustrial BiotechnologyMicrobial EcologyMicrobial GeneticsAnaerobic DigestionBiogas ProductionIndustrial FermentationMicrobial FermentationMicrobial Strain SelectionStrain ImprovementAdaptive Laboratory Evolution MutagenesisBioethanolBioethanol ProductionEthanol ProductionGenetic Stability In CultureMicrobial Ethanol ProductionMicrobial Strain EngineeringStrain Adaptation
BACKGROUND: Reducing fresh water consumption and nutrient addition will be an effective way to reduce the whole cost of bioethanol production. On the other hand, treatment of biogas slurry derived from anaerobic digestion (AD), in which a great amount of nutrients is still left, costs too much to remove these pollutants. It would be beneficial for both digestate valorization and ethanol production if biogas slurry is used for producing bioethanol. However, both hyperosmosis and potential biotoxic components of the biogas slurry can severely inhibit fermentation. RESULTS: in biogas slurry. Mutants D95 and S912 were identified. Growth of the mutants was remarkably improved in biogas slurry. The highest ethanol productivity reached 0.63 g/L/h which was 61.7% higher than ZM4 (0.39 g/L/h). Genomic re-sequencing results also revealed that single nucleic variations (SNVs) and Indels occurred in the mutants, which are likely related to inhibitor in biogas slurry and low pH tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that these mutant strains have great potential to produce ethanol using biogas slurry to replace fresh water and nutrients.
31
Simon Kizito, Shubiao Wu, Wesley Kipkemoi Kirui et al. · The Science of The Total Environment · 2014 · 538 citations
Engineering, Agricultural Engineering, Environmental Engineering +15
Jean Swings, J. De Ley · Bacteriological Reviews · 1977 · 307 citations