International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · 2019 · 40 citations · 11 references
Social SciencesHigher EducationEnvironmental EducationSustainability ScienceSustainable DevelopmentEnvironmental SustainabilityPeer LearningSustainability EducationHigher Education For SustainabilityInstitutional Sustainability EducationInterlinkages Among Sustainable Development GoalsOnline Peer CollaborationSustainable Development Goals AlignmentSustainable Development Goals Education
Universities can leverage teaching, research, and operations to advance solutions to climate change, hunger, and other Sustainable Development Goals, yet sustainability remains a niche pursuit. This study aims to demonstrate the importance of self‑efficacy approaches through the Green Office model, strengthening collaboration across higher education communities and inspiring campus sustainability offices to overcome the lack of change structures. The authors employed a two‑step methodology: first analysing existing Green Offices to identify drivers and barriers, then developing and testing a peer‑to‑peer digital training program to equip students, staff, and academics with the skills to establish or improve sustainability offices. The research identified three obstacles to disseminating the Green Office model—adaptation of international experiences, missing educational offerings, and limited public relations—but also provided evidence that the model is replicable across university contexts and scalable internationally. The study was limited by restricted access to information from university actors outside the Green Office community.
Purpose The lack of change structures can be seen as an important reason why sustainability continues to suffer a niche existence in most higher education organisations. This is a problem because universities can leverage their teaching, research and operations to advance solutions to climate change, hunger and other Sustainable Development Goals. The purpose of this study is to highlight the vital importance of self-efficacy approaches, in particular the Green Office (GO) Model that aims to strengthen collaboration among all members of higher education communities and provides inspiration for what a sustainability office on campus might look like. Design/methodology/approach The research presented follows a two-step methodology. First, the peculiarities and commonalities of already existing GOs were analysed to better understand drivers and barriers for their institutionalisation. Building on this, a peer-to-peer digital training programme was developed and tested, aiming to provide students, staff and academics with knowledge and skills to establish more sustainability offices and improve the work of existing ones. Findings Research revealed three main obstacles for the dissemination of the GO model: lack of adaptation of international experiences to other university contexts, missing educational offers and a limited scope of public relations. The findings adduce proof that GO provides a replicable model that can be both adapted to different university contexts and scaled internationally. Research limitations/implications This research has been limited by the availability and ability to procure information from the sampled universities’ actors beyond the close GO community. Originality/value This case study presents an original research and development undertaking that was realised in a unique collaboration between a non-profit, student-initiated social business and an academic institution.
11
Maik Adomßent, Daniel Fischer, Jasmin Godemann et al. · Journal of Cleaner Production · 2013 · 234 citations · Full text
Social Sciences, Higher Education, Sustainability Management +17
Matthias Barth, Maik Adomßent, Daniel Fischer et al. · Journal of Cleaner Production · 2013 · 186 citations · Full text
Education, Higher Education, Higher Education Administration +12