The Astrophysical Journal · 2019 · 168 citations · 63 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsObservational AstronomyStellar AstronomyAstrometric Error AnalysisParallax MeasurementRed GiantsStar CatalogsStellar EvolutionStellar StructureCore Helium BurningGaia AstrometryGaia Parallax DataParallax Zero PointRed Giant Branch StarsRed Giant StarsStellar ParallaxTemperature Scales
Abstract We present an independent confirmation of the zero-point offset of Gaia Data Release 2 parallaxes using asteroseismic data of evolved stars in the Kepler field. Using well-characterized red giant branch stars from the APOKASC-2 catalog, we identify a Gaia astrometric pseudocolor ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>eff</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> )- and Gaia G -band magnitude-dependent zero-point offset of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ϖ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>seis</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> − <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ϖ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Gaia</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> = 52.8 ± 2.4 (rand.) ± 8.6 (syst.) − (150.7 ± 22.7)( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>eff</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> − 1.5) − (4.21 ± 0.77)( G − 12.2) μ as, in the sense that Gaia parallaxes are too small. The offset is found in high- and low-extinction samples, as well as among both shell H-burning red giant stars and core He-burning red clump stars. We show that errors in the asteroseismic radius and temperature scales may be distinguished from errors in the Gaia parallax scale. We estimate systematic effects on the inferred global Gaia parallax offset, c , due to radius and temperature systematics, as well as choices in bolometric correction and the adopted form for Gaia parallax spatial correlations. Because of possible spatially correlated parallax errors, as discussed by the Gaia team, our Gaia parallax offset model is specific to the Kepler field, but broadly compatible with the magnitude- and color-dependent offset inferred by the Gaia team and several subsequent investigations using independent methods.
63
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Michael F. Skrutskie, R. M. Cutri, R. Stiening et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 2006 · 12.2K citations · Full text
<tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2013 · 11.9K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +14
A. G. A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2018 · 8.7K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +15
T. Prusti, J. H. J. de Bruijne, A. G. A. Brown et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2016 · 7K citations · Full text