Forests · 2019 · 247 citations · 44 references
ComputingForestryGeoinformaticsForest InventoryMachine LearningRemote SensingClassificationDecision TreesEnsemble LearningEnsemble MethodsLand Cover ClassificationSupport Vector MachinesEnsemble ClassificationForest Fire ModelingForest Fire MonitoringForest Inventory MappingRandom Forest ClassificationRandom ForestsSupport Vector ClassificationSupport Vector Machine Classification
The main objectives of this paper are to demonstrate the results of an ensemble learning method based on prediction results of support vector machine and random forest methods using Bayesian average. In this study, we generated susceptibility maps of forest fire using supervised machine learning method (support vector machine—SVM) and its comparison with a versatile machine learning algorithm (random forest—RF) and their ensembles. In order to achieve this, first of all, a forest fire inventory map was constructed using Serbian historical forest fire database, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro radiometer (MODIS), Landsat 8 OLI and Worldview-2 satellite images, field surveys, and interpretation of aerial photo images. A total of 126 forest fire locations were identified and randomly divided by a random selection algorithm into two groups, including training (70%) and validation data sets (30%). Forest fire susceptibility maps were prepared using SVM, RF, and their ensemble models using the training dataset and 14 selected different conditioning factors. Finally, to explore the performance of the mentioned models we used the values for area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The results depicted that the ensemble model had an AUC = 0.848, followed by the SVM model (AUC = 0.844), and RF model (AUC = 0.834). According to achieved AUC results, it can be deduced that SVM, RF, and their ensemble method had satisfactory performance. The study was applied in the Tara National Park (West Serbia), a region of about 191.7 sq. km distinguished by a very high forest density and a large number of forest fires.
44
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Andy Liaw, Matthew C. Wiener · 2007 · 18.4K citations
A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors
Robert M. O’Brien · Quality & Quantity · 2007 · 10.5K citations
RANDOM FORESTS FOR CLASSIFICATION IN ECOLOGY
D. Richard Cutler, Thomas C. Edwards, Karen H. Beard et al. · Ecology · 2007 · 4.8K citations
Bernhard Schölkopf, Alex Smola, Robert C. Williamson et al. · Neural Computation · 2000 · 2.8K citations