BMJ Open · 2019 · 17 citations · 19 references
Health ProfessionsHealth AdministrationHealth Services AdministrationHealth Services ResearchHealthcare Quality ImprovementOutcomes ResearchHealth Program EvaluationHealth Program ManagementHealth Services EvaluationHealthcare Stakeholder EngagementPublic-private Partnerships In HealthHealth Evidence SynthesisHealth Outcomes AnalysisHealth Policy DevelopmentHealth Program ImplementationHealth Service Quality AssessmentHealth Services PolicyResearch Evidence IntegrationSearch Inclusion
With a multitude of variables, the combinations of care, health program activities and outcomes are infinite, and this renders improvement efforts to complex health service interventions particularly intricate. Here, we describe a framework that seeks to incorporate research evidence and the multi-faceted considerations of stakeholders, context and resources to co-create sustainable health solutions that improve the health outcomes of patients and communities. This evidence- in formed, co-creation framework for the D esign, E valuation and P rocuremen t of H ealth services (in-DEPtH) is a systematic approach to support health agencies to commission services that are evidence-informed, contextually relevant and stakeholder engaged. The framework consists of several steps from defining the research question, health outcomes and search inclusion criteria, to the synthesis of evidence, and to co-creation and Delphi consultations with stakeholders. In this paper, we describe the various steps of the framework and explain the theoretical methods underpinning the framework. The approach of the framework is context neutral and can be applied to healthcare systems of different countries.
19
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh, Gill Westhorp et al. · BMC Medicine · 2013 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Changing how we think about healthcare improvement
Jeffrey Braithwaite · BMJ · 2018 · 525 citations · Full text