On Culinary Authenticity

Matthew S. Strohl

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · 2019 · 42 citations · 10 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Culinary authenticity debates often highlight Euro‑American attempts to claim authenticity in ethnic foods and their sociopolitical implications. The article aims to rehabilitate the concept of culinary authenticity. The author connects culinary authenticity to broader philosophical debates, argues it is value‑neutral, develops a theory using Kendall Walton’s Categories of Art, defends it against objections, and examines aesthetic motivations for valuing authenticity. The author concludes that while some valuations of culinary authenticity are objectionable, we should not abandon interest in authenticity altogether.

Abstract

Recent discussions of culinary authenticity have focused on the problematic sociopolitical implications of Euro‐Americans seeking authenticity in food perceived as ethnic. This article seeks to rehabilitate the concept of culinary authenticity. First, the author relates the issue of culinary authenticity to other philosophical debates concerning authenticity, arguing that the concept of authenticity is value‐neutral. Second, a general theory of culinary authenticity making use of the theoretical apparatus of Kendall Walton's "Categories of Art" is developed and defended against objections. Third, a variety of reasons that authenticity is valued are discussed, with an emphasis on aesthetic reasons. Ultimately, the author acknowledges that some ways of valuing culinary authenticity are objectionable but argues that this should not lead us to abandon our interest in authenticity altogether.

References

10