International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · 2019 · 58 citations · 49 references
MedicinePerioperative MedicineSurgeryGeriatric AssessmentGeriatricsPerioperative Outcomes ResearchComprehensive Geriatric AssessmentDelirium AssessmentPreoperative AssessmentPreoperative EvaluationPreoperative Risk AssessmentDelirium Assessment ScalesDelirium Prediction ModelsDelirium Rating ScalesDelirium Risk PredictionDelirium Severity ScalesFramingham Risk ScoreSurgical Risk PredictionTrail Making Test
OBJECTIVES: Delirium is an important postoperative complication, yet predictive risk factors for postoperative delirium severity remain elusive. We hypothesized that the NSQIP risk calculation for serious complications (NSQIP-SC) or risk of death (NSQIP-D), and cognitive tests of executive function (Trail Making Tests A and B [TMTA and TMTB]), would be predictive of postoperative delirium severity. Further, we demonstrate how advanced statistical techniques can be used to identify candidate predictors. METHODS/DESIGN: Data from an ongoing perioperative prospective cohort study of 100 adults (65 y old or older) undergoing noncardiac surgery were analyzed. In addition to NSQIP-SC, NSQIP-D, TMTA, and TMTB, participant age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, tobacco use, surgery type, depression, Framingham risk score, and preoperative blood pressure were collected. The Delirium Rating Scale-R-98 (DRS) measured delirium severity; the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) identified delirium. LASSO and best subsets linear regression were employed to identify predictive risk factors. RESULTS: : 0.30). NSQIP-SC and TMTB were also selected as predictors for postoperative delirium incidence (AUROC 0.81, 95% CI, 0.72-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, we identified NSQIP risk score for serious complications and a measure of executive function, TMT-B, to predict postoperative delirium severity using advanced modeling techniques. Future studies should investigate the utility of these variables in a formal delirium severity prediction model.
49
General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care
Ralph B. D’Agostino, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Michael Pencina et al. · Circulation · 2008 · 7.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Risk Analysis +16
Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method
Sharon K. Inouye · Annals of Internal Medicine · 1990 · 5.3K citations
Karel G.M. Moons, Douglas G. Altman, Johannes B. Reitsma et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 5.2K citations · Full text
Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models
Ewout W. Steyerberg, Andrew J. Vickers, Nancy R. Cook et al. · Epidemiology · 2009 · 4.9K citations · Full text