arXiv (Cornell University) · 2019 · 18 citations · 18 references
ComputingComputer ScienceArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingAnnotationDependency ParsingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModelsNatural Language UnderstandingSentence StructureFine-tuningLanguage Model Fine-tuningLanguage Model PretrainingNeural Language ModelsNon-associative LearningPretrainingPretraining ObjectivesSentence Modeling
Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) was proposed as an AI-hard problem in testing computers' intelligence on common sense representation and reasoning. This paper presents the new state-of-theart on WSC, achieving an accuracy of 71.1%. We demonstrate that the leading performance benefits from jointly modelling sentence structures, utilizing knowledge learned from cutting-edge pretraining models, and performing fine-tuning. We conduct detailed analyses, showing that fine-tuning is critical for achieving the performance, but it helps more on the simpler associative problems. Modelling sentence dependency structures, however, consistently helps on the harder non-associative subset of WSC. Analysis also shows that larger fine-tuning datasets yield better performances, suggesting the potential benefit of future work on annotating more Winograd schema sentences.
18
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Tomáš Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2013 · 18.1K citations · Full text
Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2013 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Understanding natural language
Terry Winograd · Cognitive Psychology · 1972 · 2.8K citations
Hector J. Levesque · 2011 · 865 citations