Annals of Surgery · 2019 · 241 citations · 24 references
MedicinePerioperative MedicineSurgeryHealthcare Quality ImprovementOutcomes ResearchRisk AssessmentComprehensive Geriatric AssessmentFrailty AssessmentFrailty IndexPreoperative Risk AssessmentQuality Of CareRisk StratificationExternal Validation CohortsExternal Validation Of Risk ModelsFrailty Index Outcomes PredictionFrailty Index ValidationModel Performance AnalysisModel Performance EvaluationPostoperative Risk PredictionPredictive Model Performance
OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) predicts 30-, 180-, and 365-day mortality based on variables constitutive of frailty. Initially validated, in a single-center Veteran hospital, we sought to improve model performance by recalibrating the RAI in a large, veteran surgical registry, and to externally validate it in both a national surgical registry and a cohort of surgical patients for whom RAI was measured prospectively before surgery. METHODS: The RAI was recalibrated among development and confirmation samples within the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP; 2010-2014; N = 480,731) including major, elective noncardiac surgery patients to create the revised RAI (RAI-rev), comparing discrimination and calibration. The model was tested externally in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (NSQIP; 2005-2014; N = 1,391,785), and in a prospectively collected cohort from the Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System VA (NWIHCS; N = 6,856). RESULTS: Recalibrating the RAI significantly improved discrimination for 30-day [c = 0.84-0.86], 180-day [c = 0.81-0.84], and 365-day mortality [c = 0.78-0.82] (P < 0.001 for all) in VASQIP. The RAI-rev also had markedly better calibration (median absolute difference between observed and predicted 180-day mortality: decreased from 8.45% to 1.23%). RAI-rev was highly predictive of 30-day mortality (c = 0.87) in external validation with excellent calibration (median absolute difference between observed and predicted 30-day mortality: 0.6%). The discrimination was highly robust in men (c = 0.85) and women (c = 0.89). Discrimination also improved in the prospectively measured cohort from NWIHCS for 180-day mortality [c = 0.77 to 0.80] (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RAI-rev has improved discrimination and calibration as a frailty-screening tool in surgical patients. It has robust external validity in men and women across a wide range of surgical settings and available for immediate implementation for risk assessment and counseling in preoperative patients.
24
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
Linda P. Fried, Catherine M. Tangen, Jeremy Walston et al. · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · 2001 · 24.5K citations · Full text
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
N. J. D. Nagelkerke · Biometrika · 1991 · 5.7K citations
The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP
Shukri F. Khuri, Jennifer Daley, William G. Henderson et al. · Annals of Surgery · 1998 · 1.5K citations · Full text