PLoS ONE · 2019 · 38 citations · 26 references
MedicinePerioperative MedicineSurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryPerioperative Outcomes ResearchVascular SurgeryAortic Dissection ManagementAortic SurgeryAcute Aortic DissectionArterial Dissection RepairCardiovascular SurgeryIn-hospital MortalityType A Aortic Dissection
BACKGROUND: Repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a complex and emergent cardiovascular surgery that is associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. Each cannulation strategy has different benefits and drawbacks during cardiopulmonary bypass. Using a retrospective study design, we aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of right axillary artery cannulation in combination with femoral artery cannulation compared to single arterial cannulation for ATAAD repair. METHODS: From January 2007 to July 2017, 476 adult patients underwent ATAAD repair at a single institution. Patients were classified into groups according to their cannulation strategy: the double arterial cannulation (DAC) group (n = 377; 79.2%) or single arterial cannulation (SAC) group (n = 99; 20.8%). Preoperative demographics, surgical information, and postoperative recovery were compared between both groups. Survival and freedom from reoperation rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier actuarial method. RESULTS: Demographics, comorbidities, and surgical procedures were generally homogenous between the two groups, except for sex, age, and rate of extensive aortic repair. Patients who underwent DAC had lower in-hospital mortality (13.5% vs. 25.3%; P = 0.005) and lower incidence of malperfusion-related complications (18.8% vs. 30.3%; P = 0.011) than those who underwent SAC. During multivariate analysis, SAC was identified as an in-hospital mortality predictor (odds ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-5.17; P = 0.001), as were preoperative ventilator support, intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation installation, and postoperative malperfusion-related complications. Three-year cumulative survival and freedom from reoperation rates were 74.8% and 85.3% for the DAC group and 62.6% and 81.1% for the SAC group, respectively (P = 0.010 and 0.430, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: With acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes, DAC is effective and safe for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass during ATAAD repair.
26
Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Acute Aortic Dissection
Linda Pape, Mazen Awais, Elise M. Woznicki et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2015 · 1.1K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +12
Joseph F. Sabik, Bruce W. Lytle, Patrick M. McCarthy et al. · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · 1995 · 380 citations · Full text