Concepedia

TLDR

Proton therapy has traditionally assumed a relative biological effectiveness of 1.1, though actual RBE values can vary. The report aims to evaluate whether the constant RBE of 1.1 should be revised, identify sites where variable RBE could benefit treatment, assess the clinical consequences of variable RBE models, recommend experiments to improve RBE understanding, and provide recommendations to mitigate uncertainties. The report reviews current knowledge of RBE variations and discusses their clinical relevance in proton therapy.

Abstract

The biological effectiveness of proton beams relative to photon beams in radiation therapy has been taken to be 1.1 throughout the history of proton therapy. While potentially appropriate as an average value, actual relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values may differ. This Task Group report outlines the basic concepts of RBE as well as the biophysical interpretation and mathematical concepts. The current knowledge on RBE variations is reviewed and discussed in the context of the current clinical use of RBE and the clinical relevance of RBE variations (with respect to physical as well as biological parameters). The following task group aims were designed to guide the current clinical practice: Assess whether the current clinical practice of using a constant RBE for protons should be revised or maintained. Identifying sites and treatment strategies where variable RBE might be utilized for a clinical benefit. Assess the potential clinical consequences of delivering biologically weighted proton doses based on variable RBE and/or LET models implemented in treatment planning systems. Recommend experiments needed to improve our current understanding of the relationships among in vitro, in vivo, and clinical RBE, and the research required to develop models. Develop recommendations to minimize the effects of uncertainties associated with proton RBE for well-defined tumor types and critical structures.

References

YearCitations

Page 1